Difference between revisions of "Prefixes and infixes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
# treating LFs as sets |
# treating LFs as sets |
||
# detecting lexical forms in the sequence they are generated by the tagger |
# detecting lexical forms in the sequence they are generated by the tagger |
||
The tagger should probably also be changed to deal with prefixes. |
|||
Revision as of 15:07, 26 May 2007
One solution would be to see lexical forms (LFs) as sets and not as sequences. e.g. pl.n.kitabu or pl.kitabu.n would be the same (swahili)
Two possible ways:
- normalization of some kind, perhaps specified with some rules
- treating LFs as sets
- detecting lexical forms in the sequence they are generated by the tagger
The tagger should probably also be changed to deal with prefixes.
