Difference between revisions of "Lttoolbox and lexc"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
</pardef> |
</pardef> |
||
</pardefs> |
</pardefs> |
||
<section id=" |
<section id="Root" type="standard"> |
||
<e lm="cat"><i>cat</i><par n="RegNounInfl"/></e> <!-- A noun --> |
<e lm="cat"><i>cat</i><par n="RegNounInfl"/></e> <!-- A noun --> |
||
</section> |
</section> |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
$ lt-comp lr test.dix test.bin |
$ lt-comp lr test.dix test.bin |
||
Root@standard 7 7 |
|||
$ echo "cat" | lt-proc test.bin |
$ echo "cat" | lt-proc test.bin |
Revision as of 13:20, 12 January 2010
Contents |
This page describes some how lttoolbox and HFST's lexc
are similar, so that people more familiar with one can get to grips more easily with the other.
Terminology
lttoolbox | lexc | Notes |
---|---|---|
Paradigm | Continuation lexicon | |
Section | Root lexicon | |
Left | Up | Both left and upper correspond to surface form |
Right | Down | Corresponds to lexical form |
Symbol | Multichar symbol | Sequences of one or more symbol which are treated as one symbol |
Example
lttoolbox
<dictionary> <sdefs> <sdef n="n"/> <sdef n="pl"/> <sdef n="sg"/> </sdefs> <pardefs> <pardef n="RegNounInfl"> <e><p><l/><r><s n="n"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e> <e><p><l>s</l><r><s n="n"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e> </pardef> </pardefs> <section id="Root" type="standard"> <e lm="cat"><i>cat</i><par n="RegNounInfl"/></e> <!-- A noun --> </section> </dictionary>
And to compile and use this dictionary:
$ lt-comp lr test.dix test.bin Root@standard 7 7 $ echo "cat" | lt-proc test.bin ^cat/cat<n><sg>$ $ echo "cats" | lt-proc test.bin ^cats/cat<n><pl>$
lexc
Multichar_Symbols +N +Pl +Sg LEXICON Root NounRoot ; LEXICON NounRoot cat RegNounInfl ; ! A noun LEXICON RegNounInfl :+N+Sg # ; s:+N+Pl # ;
And to compile and use this dictionary:
$ hfst-lexc test.lexc -o test.hfst $ echo "cat" | hfst-lookup test.hfst cat cat+N+Sg $ echo "cats" | hfst-lookup test.hfst cats cat+N+Pl