Difference between revisions of "Lttoolbox-java"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCD}} |
{{TOCD}} |
||
⚫ | |||
== What is lttoolbox == |
== What is lttoolbox == |
||
Line 54: | Line 52: | ||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
==Thanks== |
|||
⚫ | |||
During [[GSOC2009]] Raphael and Sergio worked on it, but processing still didnt work (compilation and expansion worked) |
|||
November 2009 [[Jacob Nordfalk]] finished it up and optimized it |
Revision as of 10:54, 24 November 2009
What is lttoolbox
lttoolbox are 1) making binary files out of the .dix files (lt-comp), 2) analysing or generating text (lt-proc) and 3) expanding a .dix file (lt-expand).
Reasons for a Java port
- There are several devices (mobile phones, for example) which can run quite complicated software, but only if written in Java. lttoolbox is the first step to having Apertium run on these devices.
- Windows port. It won't be as powerfull as Unix based system, but it will be there
- Apertium will be the first MT system *ever* that can be demonstradet within a Java applets
- Transfer in bytecode has a promise of speedup factor 4 - compared to what we use now (interpreted XML). And transfer CPU usage is dominating when processing large amounts of text
State fo Java port
j@j-laptop-nova:~/esperanto/apertium/lttoolbox-java/testdata/regression$ ./compare_java_and_c.sh C analysis is... 0.41sec OK Java analysis is... 3.13sec OK C generator -g is ... 0.34sec OK Java generator -g is ... 2.31sec OK C generator -d is ... 0.32sec OK Java generator -d is ... 2.09sec OK C generator -n is ... 0.32sec OK Java generator -n is ... 2.56sec OK C postgenerator -p is ... 0.04sec OK Java postgenerator -p is ... 1.19sec OK All tests passed
--Jacob Nordfalk 10:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Features
- Binary compatibility with lttoolbox. lttoolbox-java is able _read_ and _write_ the binary files lttoolbox and generates exactly the same output
- There is a comprehensive test suite that tests both lttoolbox (C++) and lttoolbox-java.
Other notes
<Drew_> jacobEo: I can't find a main class in the source code, am I looking in the wrong place? :S <jacobEo> Drew_: LTComp.java, LTExpand.java, LTProc.java
Thanks
Nic Cottrell contributed an initial version of a Java port of lttoolbox. During GSOC2009 Raphael and Sergio worked on it, but processing still didnt work (compilation and expansion worked) November 2009 Jacob Nordfalk finished it up and optimized it