Difference between revisions of "Separable verbs"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCD}} |
|||
Apertium may have some problems when dealing with '''separable verbs'''. Separable verbs are verbs that are formed with a verb stem, and a particle. For futher information see Wikipedia article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separable_verb here]. These exist in most Germanic languages, and also languages such as Hungarian. |
Apertium may have some problems when dealing with '''separable verbs'''. Separable verbs are verbs that are formed with a verb stem, and a particle. For futher information see Wikipedia article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separable_verb here]. These exist in most Germanic languages, and also languages such as Hungarian. |
||
Revision as of 22:26, 7 August 2007
Apertium may have some problems when dealing with separable verbs. Separable verbs are verbs that are formed with a verb stem, and a particle. For futher information see Wikipedia article here. These exist in most Germanic languages, and also languages such as Hungarian.
For example, in Afrikaans, the verb "to announce" is "aankondig". The usage is as follows:
- Sterrekundiges kondig [die ontdekking] aan.
- Astronomers announce [the discovery].
The stem "kondig" does not by itself mean anything, only in conjunction with the particle "aan", however this is not always the case. The past participle is formed by inserting "ge" in between the particle and the stem, for example:
- Sterrekundiges het [die ontdekking] aangekondig.
- Astronomers have announced [the discovery].
Currently Apertium has difficulty supporting this kind of feature in the morphological dictionaries.
Possible solutions
Several paradigms
Currently in the Afrikaans-English pair, separable verbs are dealt with as follows: Three paradigms are defined for verbs. The first is a list of possible particles/affixes (for example, "aan", "op", "onder", ...), the second is the "ge" past tense marker, the third is the standard verb ending paradigm.
So, for each separable verb, the definition looks something like:
<e lm="kondig"><par n="attached__particles"/><par n="ge__past"/><i>kondig</i><par n="breek__vblex"/>
This allows us to analyse:
- aankondig (announce)
- aangekondig (announced)
- kondig (announce) — Note: this is incorrect!
However, in an example such as above, where the "aan" portion is moved after the noun phrase in the sentence, we cannot analyse this, we instead rely on the fact that "kondig" does not have a meaning without "aan". Unfortunately this is not always the case...
Take for example, the verbs "onderdruk" and "druk". The former means "to suppress", the latter means "to press" or "to squeeze". So when we try and translate "onderdruk" → "suppress", instead we get "press under", or "squeeze under". This is not a good translation. Furthermore, we cannot define "druk" as "suppress" and simply let the particle take care of itself, because "druk" has another meaning.
See also
Further reading
- ten Hacken, P. and Bopp, S. (1998) "Separable Verbs in a Reusable Morphological Dictionary for German". Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 471 - 475