https://wiki.apertium.org/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=User_talk%3ASambit%2FGSoC_proposal_2017%3A_Odia_and_EnglishUser talk:Sambit/GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English - Revision history2026-04-16T04:23:00ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1https://wiki.apertium.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sambit/GSoC_proposal_2017:_Odia_and_English&diff=62764&oldid=prevFrancis Tyers: Francis Tyers moved page Talk:GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English to User talk:Sambit/GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English2017-04-05T17:31:39Z<p>Francis Tyers moved page <a href="/wiki/Talk:GSoC_proposal_2017:_Odia_and_English" class="mw-redirect" title="Talk:GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English">Talk:GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English</a> to <a href="/wiki/User_talk:Sambit/GSoC_proposal_2017:_Odia_and_English" title="User talk:Sambit/GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English">User talk:Sambit/GSoC proposal 2017: Odia and English</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 17:31, 5 April 2017</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Francis Tyershttps://wiki.apertium.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sambit/GSoC_proposal_2017:_Odia_and_English&diff=62450&oldid=prevUnhammer: Created page with "==feedback== "Bootstrapped new language pair(odi.eng) with existing eng monodix." – the language code is "ori", no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639:ori On pairs with ..."2017-04-02T08:22:23Z<p>Created page with "==feedback== "Bootstrapped new language pair(odi.eng) with existing eng monodix." – the language code is "ori", no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639:ori On pairs with ..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>==feedback==<br />
"Bootstrapped new language pair(odi.eng) with existing eng monodix." – the language code is "ori", no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639:ori<br />
<br />
On pairs with English: We're normally skeptical about it, since English has so much data that corpus-based methods work very well and it's very difficult to get higher quality than Google etc., but in this case things are different since there's no Odia in Google. I'd still mention in the proposal how the Odia morphology+tagger that you're making will also be good groundwork for future translators with Odia to/from related languages (of which there are many to pick from :)). <br />
<br />
You haven't mentioned anything about what resources you plan on using – what have you found so far? (grammars, dictionaries, corpora, any existing NLP stuff at all?)</div>Unhammer