User:SilentFlame/Progress - Revision history

SilentFlame at 20:11, 16 July 2017

2017-07-16T20:11:31Z

Unhammer: /* Interchunk */

2017-06-06T11:31:42Z

Interchunk

Unhammer: /* Interchunk */

2017-05-30T09:23:51Z

Interchunk

Unhammer: /* Interchunk */

2017-05-30T09:23:40Z

Interchunk

Unhammer: /* Interchunk */

2017-05-30T09:23:25Z

Interchunk

Unhammer: /* lttoolbox */

2017-05-14T12:15:06Z

lttoolbox

Unhammer: /* etc */

2017-05-14T12:13:58Z

etc

Unhammer: /* postchunk */

2017-05-14T12:12:53Z

postchunk

Unhammer: /* transfer (non-chunking) */

2017-05-14T12:12:43Z

transfer (non-chunking)

Unhammer: /* postchunk */

2017-05-14T12:12:18Z

postchunk

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Current task==
-===Interchunk===
-Interchunk needs to ignore the "pos" argument to b elements, and output each superblank exactly once, preferably where the rule has a b element (if there are not enough b's, output the rest at the end of the rule).
-Interchunk shouldn't have to deal with wordblanks, since we can't look inside chunks when in interchunk.
-# Apply changes to transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
-#* Check <code>git clone -b blank-handling https://github.com/unhammer/apertium</code>
-#* Apply the <code>git diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991</code> from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
-#* Try to make it compile and run – report things that didn't seem to have a 1-1 correspondence
-#* Write tests for interchunk, like those for transfer at https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/tree/blank-handling/tests
-==TODO==
-===Deformatters===
-* Complete prototype HTML deformatters
-** Current prototype code at https://github.com/junaidiiith/apertium / https://github.com/junaidiiith/Apertium_Code and https://github.com/SilentFlame/apertium/
-** Task: Create a clean pull request to https://github.com/unhammer with HTML deformatter and reformatter, including tests
-===Reformatters===
-* Make reformat turn inline-blanks back into real tags
-** <nowiki>[{&lt;i&gt;}]foo [{&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;}]bar</nowiki> should become &lt;i&gt;foo&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;bar&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
-** prototypes exist for this in https://github.com/junaidiiith/apertium / https://github.com/junaidiiith/Apertium_Code
 ===lttoolbox===
 * Make lt-proc correctly disperse inline blanks onto each lexical unit until the next <code><nowiki>[</nowiki></code>
 * Task: Create a pull request to https://github.com/unhammer/lttoolbox/ with tests in https://github.com/unhammer/lttoolbox/tree/master/tests/lt_proc
+==TODO==
 ===hfst===
 * Make hfst-proc correctly disperse inline blanks onto each lexical unit until the next <code><nowiki>[</nowiki></code>
@@ Line 67: / Line 46: @@
 #* uncommenting apertium/transfer.cc:1259 <code>    // delete[] format;</code> in the blank handling branch leads to a double-free – find out why and ensure we're correctly releasing memory
 #* Install valgrind from your package manager or http://valgrind.org/, then compile your program with -O0 -g3, then run <code>valgrind -v --leak-check=full apertium/apertium-transfer</code> and read the output
+===Interchunk===
+Interchunk needs to ignore the "pos" argument to b elements, and output each superblank exactly once, preferably where the rule has a b element (if there are not enough b's, output the rest at the end of the rule).
+Interchunk shouldn't have to deal with wordblanks, since we can't look inside chunks when in interchunk.
+# Apply changes to transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
+#* Check <code>git clone -b blank-handling https://github.com/unhammer/apertium</code>
+#* Apply the <code>git diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991</code> from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
+#* Try to make it compile and run – report things that didn't seem to have a 1-1 correspondence
+#* Write tests for interchunk, like those for transfer at https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/tree/blank-handling/tests
+===Deformatters===
+* Complete prototype HTML deformatters
+** Current prototype code at https://github.com/junaidiiith/apertium / https://github.com/junaidiiith/Apertium_Code and https://github.com/SilentFlame/apertium/
+** Task: Create a clean pull request to https://github.com/unhammer with HTML deformatter and reformatter, including tests
+===Reformatters===
+* Make reformat turn inline-blanks back into real tags
+** <nowiki>[{&lt;i&gt;}]foo [{&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;}]bar</nowiki> should become &lt;i&gt;foo&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;bar&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
+** prototypes exist for this in https://github.com/junaidiiith/apertium / https://github.com/junaidiiith/Apertium_Code

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Current task==
 ===Interchunk===
+Interchunk needs to ignore the "pos" argument to b elements, and output each superblank exactly once, preferably where the rule has a b element (if there are not enough b's, output the rest at the end of the rule).
+Interchunk shouldn't have to deal with wordblanks, since we can't look inside chunks when in interchunk.
 # Apply changes to transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Check <code>git clone -b blank-handling https://github.com/unhammer/apertium</code>

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 # Apply changes to transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Check <code>git clone -b blank-handling https://github.com/unhammer/apertium</code>
-#* Apply the <code>git diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991</git> from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
+#* Apply the <code>git diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991</code> from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Try to make it compile and run – report things that didn't seem to have a 1-1 correspondence
 #* Write tests for interchunk, like those for transfer at https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/tree/blank-handling/tests

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 # Apply changes to transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Check <code>git clone -b blank-handling https://github.com/unhammer/apertium</code>
-#* Apply the diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991 from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
+#* Apply the <code>git diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991</git> from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Try to make it compile and run – report things that didn't seem to have a 1-1 correspondence
 #* Write tests for interchunk, like those for transfer at https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/tree/blank-handling/tests

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 # Apply changes to transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Check <code>git clone -b blank-handling https://github.com/unhammer/apertium</code>
-#* Apply the diff (between that branch and master) from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
+#* Apply the diff 4c7c4f8f1b..2025182991 from transfer.cc to interchunk.cc
 #* Try to make it compile and run – report things that didn't seem to have a 1-1 correspondence
 #* Write tests for interchunk, like those for transfer at https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/tree/blank-handling/tests

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 ===etc===
-* Ensure all other modules are fine with the new format for inline blanks
+* Ensure all other modules are fine with the new format for inline blanks (e.g. cg-proc)
 * Work on other deformatters (mediawiki? latex?)

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 (Should be done after interchunk is complete)
-* Task: PR to https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/ including tests showing working postchunk blank handling – test that rules using wrong/missing b-elements should not mess up formatting
+* Task: PR to https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/ including tests showing working postchunk blank handling – test that rules using misnumbered/missing b-elements should not mess up formatting
 ===etc===

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ===transfer (non-chunking)===
 * Test if current transfer.cc handles non-chunking/single-stage transfer correctly, if not, fix
-* Task: PR to https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/ with tests showing working transfer.cc for single-stage/non-chunking transfer, with inline vs block-level blank handling
+* Task: PR to https://github.com/unhammer/apertium/ with tests showing working transfer.cc for single-stage/non-chunking transfer, with inline vs block-level blank handling and test that rules using misnumbered/missing b-elements should not mess up formatting
 ===postchunk===