Talk:Format handling - Revision history

Unhammer at 13:50, 25 June 2014

2014-06-25T13:50:57Z

2010-08-01T13:39:39Z

2009-12-23T19:39:25Z

2009-12-23T18:15:26Z

2009-12-23T18:15:00Z

Created page with 'Mediawiki format would be very interesting to have for me...'

New page

Mediawiki format would be very interesting to have for me...

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 : http://code.google.com/p/apertium-mediawiki/ is even better :) --[[User:Unhammer|unhammer]] 13:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
+==Why the extra full stops==
+<pre>
+<spectie> .[][
+<spectie> ]
+<Flammie> mystic extra full stops appearing			        [14:06]
+<spectie> yeah, that is annoying... and should be remoeved
+<spectie> the only reason they are there
+<spectie> is because of the tagger
+<spectie> if there was no full stop it would not know where to flush
+</pre>
+It's easy make all the formatter tools stop doing it by applying
+<pre>
+Index: apertium/deformat.xsl
+===================================================================
+--- apertium/deformat.xsl	(revision 30823)
++++ apertium/deformat.xsl	(working copy)
+@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@
+ {
+   if(eosIncond)
+   {
+-    fputws_unlocked(L".[]", yyout);
++    fputws_unlocked(L"[]", yyout);
+   }
+ }
+@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@
+ {
+   if(isDot &amp;&amp; !eosIncond)
+   {
+-    fputws_unlocked(L".[]", yyout);
++    fputws_unlocked(L"[]", yyout);
+     isDot = false;
+   }
+   if(buffer.size() &gt; <xsl:value-of select="/format/options/largeblocks/@size"/>)
+</pre>
+but apparantly it makes apertium-tagger worse.
+This sounds like a bug that should be fixed.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 1 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:There is a basic implementation of this in SVN, programs <code>apertium-desmediawiki</code> and <code>apertium-remediawiki</code>. - [[User:Francis Tyers\|Francis Tyers]] 19:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)		:There is a basic implementation of this in SVN, programs <code>apertium-desmediawiki</code> and <code>apertium-remediawiki</code>. - [[User:Francis Tyers\|Francis Tyers]] 19:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

			: http://code.google.com/p/apertium-mediawiki/ is even better :) --[[User:Unhammer\|unhammer]] 13:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 23 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Mediawiki format would be very interesting to have IMHO...		Mediawiki format would be very interesting to have IMHO... {{unsigned\|81.184.58.60}}

			:There is a basic implementation of this in SVN, programs <code>apertium-desmediawiki</code> and <code>apertium-remediawiki</code>. - [[User:Francis Tyers\|Francis Tyers]] 19:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 23 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Mediawiki format would be very interesting to have ~~for me~~...		Mediawiki format would be very interesting to have IMHO...