Speeding up monodix creation - Revision history

ScoopGracie: Oops

2020-01-26T15:36:50Z

Oops

2020-01-26T15:36:23Z

2014-10-08T08:16:02Z

Link to French page

2011-09-03T18:59:15Z

Documentation in English

2008-06-12T12:00:38Z

::: True, but I did say for a test run :) ~~~~

2008-06-12T11:35:43Z

2008-06-05T09:31:29Z

2008-06-05T09:25:13Z

2008-06-05T09:21:57Z

Tag transfer

2008-06-05T00:29:08Z

Tag transfer: Upper and Lower Sorbian are an ideal test case

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 26 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Accélérer la création de fichiers unilingues\|{{French}}}}		{{otherlang\|Accélérer la création de fichiers unilingues\|{{French}}}}

	This page outlines some ideas for increasing the speed at which [[monodix\|monolingual dictionaries]] (analysers) can be created.		This page outlines some ideas for increasing the speed at which [[monodix\|monolingual dictionaries]] (analysers) can be created.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 26 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Accélérer la création de fichiers unilingues\|~~En français]]~~		{{Accélérer la création de fichiers unilingues\|{{French}}}}

	This page outlines some ideas for increasing the speed at which [[monodix\|monolingual dictionaries]] (analysers) can be created.		This page outlines some ideas for increasing the speed at which [[monodix\|monolingual dictionaries]] (analysers) can be created.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:16, 8 October 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Accélérer la création de fichiers unilingues\|En français]]

	This page outlines some ideas for increasing the speed at which [[monodix\|monolingual dictionaries]] (analysers) can be created.		This page outlines some ideas for increasing the speed at which [[monodix\|monolingual dictionaries]] (analysers) can be created.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 3 September 2011
Line 43:		Line 43:

	[[Category:Documentation]]		[[Category:Documentation]]
			[[Category:Documentation in English]]

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ::Problem is that there is little aligned text for Upper/Lower Sorbian no? - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 10:21, 5 June 2008 (BST)
+::: True, but I did say for a test run :) [[User:Jimregan|Jimregan]] 13:00, 12 June 2008 (BST)
 [[Category:Documentation]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Try this at some point:
 <pre>
+**Issues** -- the corpora may not be well aligned (e.g. JRC-Acquis Czech--Slovak) -- try and discard shoddy alignments.
 <spectie> you have an aligned corpus
 <spectie> polish--czech, czech--slovak, danish--swedish

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 <spectie> that you have
 <spectie> align it with the swedish side
-<spectie> then read off the alignments, taking the surface forms from the right side and the tags from the left side -- note you need to specify the lemma in a config file, e.g. for nouns n.*.sg.nom
+<spectie> then read off the alignments, taking the surface forms from the right side and the tags from the left side -- note you need to specify the
+          lemma in a config file, e.g. for nouns n.*.sg.nom
 another variation of this without parallel corpora might be to use extract and then use a bilingual dictionary (or

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Extract==
+;Extract + constraints
+;Extract + constraints + corpus
 ==Tag transfer==

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 </pre>
+:I'd volunteer Upper and Lower Sorbian as ideal candidates for a test run of this: the grammar is almost 100% the same, I have an almost complete paradigm list (minus verbal participles) for Lower Sorbian, and a complete forms list for Upper Sorbian - but very little information mapping endings to cases. What little I have of Kashubian adjectives comes from a manual version of the above process, BTW. -- [[User:Jimregan|Jimregan]] 01:29, 5 June 2008 (BST)
 [[Category:Documentation]]