Kurmanji and English/TODO - Revision history

Memduh at 13:09, 21 June 2016

2016-06-21T13:09:50Z

Memduh at 21:09, 31 March 2016

2016-03-31T21:09:12Z

Memduh at 21:06, 31 March 2016

2016-03-31T21:06:42Z

Memduh at 12:13, 26 March 2016

2016-03-26T12:13:10Z

Memduh at 14:27, 23 March 2016

2016-03-23T14:27:12Z

Memduh at 13:17, 23 March 2016

2016-03-23T13:17:01Z

Memduh at 00:57, 23 March 2016

2016-03-23T00:57:02Z

Memduh: nouns, vetin

2016-03-22T22:20:40Z

nouns, vetin

Memduh at 00:43, 21 March 2016

2016-03-21T00:43:01Z

Memduh at 00:12, 21 March 2016

2016-03-21T00:12:23Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 * <s>Figure out divê (modal verb? Conjugation of divêtin?)</s>
 Zana Farqînî's dictionary considers the full form divêtin to be a noun (infinitives are feminine in Kurmanji), while in Baran Rızgar's dictionary it is considered a transitive verb. I have not yet seen this used in any person than third, regardless of tense or ergativity.
+* <i>biwa</i> looks a lot like narrative for bûn. Verify.
+* PP after a substantive in ezafet inflection could be permissible.
-'''SOLUTION''': Used the full form divêtin in a new paradigm.
-* Nouns listed as both male and female
-Şehîd is one that immediately comes to mind, however it is listed as a male in KMR-ENG, while oddly completely absent from KMR itself. There could be a new paradigm for these, but for now I am listing cases such as peyamnêr as both male and female.
-The lexicon gathered by Walther et. al. in kurlex has few masculine nouns. It seems that most masculine nouns can be used as feminine as well in the proper context. New paradigms are probably the way to go for the ambiguous/specifically masculine distinction.
-* We have axaftin as a verb, but axaviye is not analyzed, verb paradigm updates needed.
-* '''PAST TENSES''': The current verb paradigms correctly analyze past tenses, but the solution is a bit haphazard, needs to be moved from k/e to kir/ paradigm.
-* A lot of compounds are listed without their constituents, and vice versa.
-* Adverb counterpart for hemû
-* hev seems to be like Turkish "birbiri"/persian "yekdiger", match with "each other"
-* hember is listed as a noun but seems to be  used as a preposition, same meaning and function as "against"
-* bo is also a preposition alone

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == General TODO ==
-* Add past tense to verbs in dictionary
 * <s>Figure out divê (modal verb? Conjugation of divêtin?)</s>
 Zana Farqînî's dictionary considers the full form divêtin to be a noun (infinitives are feminine in Kurmanji), while in Baran Rızgar's dictionary it is considered a transitive verb. I have not yet seen this used in any person than third, regardless of tense or ergativity.
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * '''PAST TENSES''': The current verb paradigms correctly analyze past tenses, but the solution is a bit haphazard, needs to be moved from k/e to kir/ paradigm.
+* A lot of compounds are listed without their constituents, and vice versa.
 * Adverb counterpart for hemû

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Nouns listed as both male and female
 Şehîd is one that immediately comes to mind, however it is listed as a male in KMR-ENG, while oddly completely absent from KMR itself. There could be a new paradigm for these, but for now I am listing cases such as peyamnêr as both male and female.
+The lexicon gathered by Walther et. al. in kurlex has few masculine nouns. It seems that most masculine nouns can be used as feminine as well in the proper context. New paradigms are probably the way to go for the ambiguous/specifically masculine distinction.
+* We have axaftin as a verb, but axaviye is not analyzed, verb paradigm updates needed.
+* '''PAST TENSES''': The current verb paradigms correctly analyze past tenses, but the solution is a bit haphazard, needs to be moved from k/e to kir/ paradigm.
 * Adverb counterpart for hemû

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == General TODO ==
 * Add past tense to verbs in dictionary
-* Figure out divê (modal verb? Conjugation of divêtin?)
+* <s>Figure out divê (modal verb? Conjugation of divêtin?)</s>
 Zana Farqînî's dictionary considers the full form divêtin to be a noun (infinitives are feminine in Kurmanji), while in Baran Rızgar's dictionary it is considered a transitive verb. I have not yet seen this used in any person than third, regardless of tense or ergativity.
+'''SOLUTION''': Used the full form divêtin in a new paradigm.
-This could be a conjugation of vêtîn, might make sense to create a new paradigm for it.
 * Nouns listed as both male and female
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 * hember is listed as a noun but seems to be  used as a preposition, same meaning and function as "against"
+* bo is also a preposition alone

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * Nouns listed as both male and female
-Şehîd is one that immediately comes to mind, however it is listed as a male in KMR-ENG, while oddly completely absent from KMR itself.
+Şehîd is one that immediately comes to mind, however it is listed as a male in KMR-ENG, while oddly completely absent from KMR itself. There could be a new paradigm for these, but for now I am listing cases such as peyamnêr as both male and female.
 * Adverb counterpart for hemû

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * Add past tense to verbs in dictionary
 * Figure out divê (modal verb? Conjugation of divêtin?)
-Zana Farqînî's dictionary considers the full form divêtin to be a noun (infinitives are feminine in Kurmanji), while in Baran Rızgar's dictionary it is considered a transitive verb. I have not seen this used in any person than third, regardless of tense.
+Zana Farqînî's dictionary considers the full form divêtin to be a noun (infinitives are feminine in Kurmanji), while in Baran Rızgar's dictionary it is considered a transitive verb. I have not seen this used in any person than third, regardless of tense or ergativity.