Google Summer of Code/Report 2009 - Revision history

Jona at 12:20, 20 June 2019

2019-06-20T12:20:51Z

Francis Tyers: Reverted edits by 190.128.225.182 (Talk) to last revision by Darthxaher

2010-04-20T01:38:45Z

Reverted edits by 190.128.225.182 (Talk) to last revision by Darthxaher

Show changes

190.128.225.182: 1995

2010-04-19T23:45:00Z

1995

Show changes

Darthxaher: /* Conversion of Anubadok (darthxaher) */

2009-10-03T16:57:48Z

Conversion of Anubadok (darthxaher)

Darthxaher: /* Conversion of Anubadok (darthxaher) [draft] */

2009-10-03T16:54:29Z

Conversion of Anubadok (darthxaher) [draft]

Deadbeef: /* Apertium going SOA (deadbeef) */

2009-09-12T07:35:38Z

Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)

Deadbeef: /* Apertium going SOA (deadbeef) */

2009-09-12T04:40:31Z

Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)

Deadbeef: /* Apertium going SOA (deadbeef) */

2009-09-11T23:47:47Z

Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)

Deadbeef: /* Apertium going SOA (deadbeef) */

2009-09-11T23:40:08Z

Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)

Deadbeef: /* Apertium going SOA (deadbeef) */

2009-09-11T23:39:41Z

Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 20 June 2019
Line 125:		Line 125:
	==Lttoolbox Java (raah)==		==Lttoolbox Java (raah)==

	[[Category:Google Summer of Code]]		[[Category:Google Summer of Code\|Report 2009]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 3 October 2009
Line 56:		Line 56:

	'''Statistics'''		'''Statistics'''

	We have a total of 4523 words in the monodix which comprises 2035 Nouns, 866 Adjectives, 800 Proper Nouns, 432 Adverbs and some other closed category words.		We have a total of 4523 words in the monodix which comprises 2035 Nouns, 866 Adjectives, 800 Proper Nouns, 432 Adverbs and some other closed category words.

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 ==Swedish to Danish (mkrist)==
-== Conversion of Anubadok (darthxaher) [draft] ==
+== Conversion of Anubadok (darthxaher) ==
 Using Anubadok as a reference, my primary project goal was to create a functional English to Bengali translation system. The project primarily consisted of three stages.: a. create a morphological Generator+Analyzer, b. create a Bdix and c. create a transfer system.
@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 '''Statistics'''
+We have a total of 4523 words in the monodix which comprises 2035 Nouns, 866 Adjectives, 800 Proper Nouns, 432 Adverbs and some other closed category words.
 ==Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:35, 12 September 2009
Line 80:		Line 80:


	Note: due to a still unfixed bug in the LTToolBox Library (SVN version), this service could crash while handling multiple concurrent requests; this can be easily fixed by applying a small patch (included in apertium-service's sources) to ~~liblttoolbox~~. More informations [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=7f231e00906220908i40956560we9211bca67dd0e54%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=apertium-stuff here].		Note: due to a still unfixed bug in the LTToolBox Library (SVN version), this service could crash while handling multiple concurrent requests; this can be easily fixed by applying a small patch (included in apertium-service's sources) to lttoolbox. More informations [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=7f231e00906220908i40956560we9211bca67dd0e54%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=apertium-stuff here].

	==Multi-engine machine translation (snippyhollow)==		==Multi-engine machine translation (snippyhollow)==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:40, 12 September 2009
Line 69:		Line 69:


	The services has been implemented in C++: it relies on LTToolBox Library and Apertium Library for lexical processing, morphological analysis and other machine translation-related capabilities; on TextCat Library for language recognition; and on the Boost C++ Libraries for portable multithreading, regular expressions, interaction with the filesystems and a few more things. Its main difference with the known 'apertium' console application is that it doesn't rely on shellscripts, Unix pipelines or other InterProcess Communication techniques, so it can be easily ported on other enviroments, like the Windows operating systems.		The services has been implemented in C++: it relies on LTToolBox Library and Apertium Library for lexical processing, morphological analysis and other machine translation-related capabilities; on TextCat Library for language recognition; and on the Boost C++ Libraries for portable multithreading, regular expressions, interaction with the filesystems and a few more things. Its main difference with the known 'apertium' console application is that it doesn't rely on shellscripts, Unix pipelines or other InterProcess Communication techniques, so it can be easily ported on other enviroments, like the Windows operating systems. In addition, REST and SOAP interfaces to the service are provided.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 11 September 2009
Line 69:		Line 69:


	The services has been implemented in C++: it relies on ~~the~~ LTToolBox Library and ~~the~~ Apertium Library for lexical processing, morphological analysis and other machine translation-related capabilities; on ~~the~~ TextCat ~~Libraries~~ for language recognition; and on the Boost C++ Libraries for portable multithreading, regular expressions, interaction with the filesystems and a few more things. Its main difference with the ~~popular~~ 'apertium' console application is that it doesn't rely on shellscripts, Unix pipelines or other ~~kinds of~~ InterProcess Communication techniques, so it can be easily ported on other enviroments, like the Windows operating systems.		The services has been implemented in C++: it relies on LTToolBox Library and Apertium Library for lexical processing, morphological analysis and other machine translation-related capabilities; on TextCat Library for language recognition; and on the Boost C++ Libraries for portable multithreading, regular expressions, interaction with the filesystems and a few more things. Its main difference with the known 'apertium' console application is that it doesn't rely on shellscripts, Unix pipelines or other InterProcess Communication techniques, so it can be easily ported on other enviroments, like the Windows operating systems.

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 ==Apertium going SOA (deadbeef)==
 The aim of this project was to design and implement an "Apertium Service" that can be easy integrated into IT systems implemented using a model based on a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). Two fundamental requisites to this service were:
 * It should be easy to integrate to new and existing applications and services;
 * It should be able to scale efficiently a large number of concurrent requests.
 The former objective has been accomplished by implementing a XML-RPC interface to the service; XML-RPC [1] is a well known remote procedure call protocol which uses XML to encode its calls and HTTP as a transport mechanism.
@@ Line 76: / Line 78: @@
 [2] Kircher, Michael; Prashant Jain; (2002-07-04). [http://www.kircher-schwanninger.de/michael/publications/Pooling.pdf Pooling Pattern]. EuroPLoP 2002. Germany.
 Note: due to a still unfixed bug in the LTToolBox Library (SVN version), this service could crash while handling multiple concurrent requests; this can be easily fixed by applying a small patch (included in apertium-service's sources) to liblttoolbox. More informations [http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=7f231e00906220908i40956560we9211bca67dd0e54%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=apertium-stuff here].

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
-The services has been implemented in C++: it relies on the LTToolBox Library and the Apertium Library for lexical processing, morphological analysis and other machine translation-related capabilities; on the TextCat Libraries for language recognition; and on the Boost C++ Libraries for portable multithreading, regular expressions, interaction with the filesystems and a few more things.
+The services has been implemented in C++: it relies on the LTToolBox Library and the Apertium Library for lexical processing, morphological analysis and other machine translation-related capabilities; on the TextCat Libraries for language recognition; and on the Boost C++ Libraries for portable multithreading, regular expressions, interaction with the filesystems and a few more things. Its main difference with the popular 'apertium' console application is that it doesn't rely on shellscripts, Unix pipelines or other kinds of InterProcess Communication techniques, so it can be easily ported on other enviroments, like the Windows operating systems.
-Its main difference with the popular 'apertium' console application is that it doesn't rely on shellscripts, Unix pipelines or other kinds of InterProcess Communication techniques, so it can be easily ported on other enviroments, like the Windows operating systems.
 The service has revealed to be quite efficient: it takes about 15 milliseconds to translate a small common sentence like "This is a test for the machine translation program." from english to spanish.
 [1] Simon St. Laurent, Joe Johnston, Edd Dumbill. (June 2001) [http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596001193/ Programming Web Services with XML-RPC]. O'Reilly. First Edition.