Dictionary coverage - Revision history

Intello at 13:33, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T13:33:56Z

Intello at 13:32, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T13:32:23Z

Intello at 13:30, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T13:30:34Z

Intello at 13:12, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T13:12:31Z

Intello at 12:27, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T12:27:15Z

Intello at 12:21, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T12:21:52Z

Intello at 12:13, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T12:13:11Z

Intello at 11:07, 6 December 2019

2019-12-06T11:07:02Z

Intello at 14:29, 5 December 2019

2019-12-05T14:29:09Z

Intello at 14:04, 5 December 2019

2019-12-05T14:04:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 6 December 2019
Line 24:		Line 24:


	*To create a "profiler" version of your dictionaries(A profiler version of dictionary is a subdirectory of a dictionary), do:		*To create a "profiler" version of your dictionaries (A profiler version of dictionary is a subdirectory of a dictionary), do:
	$ apertium-dixtools profilecreate . sv-da		$ apertium-dixtools profilecreate . sv-da

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Couverture du dictionnaire|En français]]
-An experimental tool “[[Apertium-dixtools]]” is a good tool to do frequency statistics on a dictionary. It finds out about the used entries. It works on both normal entries as well as entries in paradigms.
+An experimental tool “[[Apertium-dixtools]]” is a good tool to do frequency statistics on a dictionary. It finds out about the entries and those which are not used. It works on both normal entries as well as entries in paradigms.
 The tool can be used to check entries in both directions. This tool has been successfully used on [[English and Esperanto]] to make the eo-en direction. Contact me (--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]], 18: 07, November 3, 2009 (UTC)) on how to use the tool.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Couverture du dictionnaire|En français]]
-An experimental tool “[[Apertium-dixtools]]” is a good tool to do frequency statistics on a dictionary. It finds out about the used entries. It works on both, normal entries as well as entries in paradigms.
+An experimental tool “[[Apertium-dixtools]]” is a good tool to do frequency statistics on a dictionary. It finds out about the used entries. It works on both normal entries as well as entries in paradigms.
-The tool can be used, to check entries in both directions. This tool has been successfully used on [[English and Esperanto]] to make the eo-en direction. Contact me (--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]], 18: 07, November 3, 2009 (UTC)) on how to use the tool.
+The tool can be used to check entries in both directions. This tool has been successfully used on [[English and Esperanto]] to make the eo-en direction. Contact me (--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]], 18: 07, November 3, 2009 (UTC)) on how to use the tool.
 The method is explained with an example of sv-da to analyse that how much of the Danish dictionary (which contains many entries not used from sv to da) is useful. The step by step procedure is:
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 This will create a file dixtools-profilekeys.txt and overwrite the profiler/*.dix dictionaries.
-*Now do
+*Now do:
   $ cd profiler
   $ make

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Couverture du dictionnaire|En français]]
-An experimental tool “[[Apertium-dixtools]]” exists to do frequency statistics on a dictionary. It finds out which entries have been used and which entries have not been used. It works on both, normal entries as well as entries in paradigms.
+An experimental tool “[[Apertium-dixtools]]” is a good tool to do frequency statistics on a dictionary. It finds out about the used entries. It works on both, normal entries as well as entries in paradigms.
-The tool can be used, for example, if you have a pair of languages that you want to work in the other direction. The tool has been successfully used on [[English and Esperanto]] to make the eo-en direction. Contact me (--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]], 18: 07, November 3, 2009 (UTC)) for help using it.
+The tool can be used, to check entries in both directions. This tool has been successfully used on [[English and Esperanto]] to make the eo-en direction. Contact me (--[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]], 18: 07, November 3, 2009 (UTC)) on how to use the tool.
-Here is the method how it could be applied on sv-da to analyse how much of the Danish dictionary (which contains many entries not used from sv to da) is useful. The steps would be:
+The method is explained with an example of sv-da to analyse that how much of the Danish dictionary (which contains many entries not used from sv to da) is useful. The step by step procedure is:
 #Remove duplicates in dictionaries.
 #Make a copy of the pair in the profiler/sub directory.
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
+Example:
-The steps are explained with suitable examples as below:
 *To remove duplicates in dictionary, do:
   apertium-dixtools fix -alignBidix apertium-sv-da.sv-da.dix apertium-sv-da.sv-da.dix
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
   $ make
-*To edit the modes.xml and add a mode where you replace with usage of the profiling version of the dictionary, after which the task '''apertium-dixtools profilecollect''' must be inserted
+*To edit the modes.xml and add a mode select the place where you want to replace usage of the profiling version of the dictionary and after which the task '''apertium-dixtools profilecollect''' must be inserted.
- to collect the data (saving it to dixtools-profiledata.txt) and filter the output for the following stages in the mode file, do:
+*To collect the data (saving it to dixtools-profiledata.txt) and filter the output for the following stages in the mode file, do:
       <program name="lt-proc $1">
         <file name="sv-da.autogen.bin"/>
@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 </pre>
+This results in:
-becomes
 <pre>
 <pardef n="b/urde__vbmod">
@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 </pre>
-The dixtools-profileresult.txt contains-
+The dixtools-profileresult.txt now contains:
 <pre>
 bct <e><l>urde</l><r>urde<vbmod><inf><actv></r></e>

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Here is the method how it could be applied on sv-da to analyse how much of the Danish dictionary (which contains many entries not used from sv to da) is useful. The steps would be:
-#Remove duplicates in dixes
+#Remove duplicates in dictionaries.
-#Make a copy of the pair in the profiler/ subdirectory
+#Make a copy of the pair in the profiler/sub directory.
 #Create a "profiler" version of your dictionaries.
 #Edit the modes.xml and add a mode.

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ==How it works==
-To add keys to the dictionaries, do( See also [[Monodix basics]]) :
+To add keys to the dictionaries, do:
 <pre>
 <pardef n="b/urde__vbmod">
@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 </pre>
 So you can see that the first paradigm isn't used at all. While, in the 2nd paradigm the %bcy% was used 41 times and the other entries 1 time each.
-*See also [[List of symbols]].
+*See also [[Monodix basics]].
+*See also [[List of symbols]]
 [[Category:Dixtools]]
 [[Category:Documentation in English]]

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 </pre>
-The dixtools-profileresult.txt contains
+The dixtools-profile result.txt contains-
 <pre>
 bct <e><l>urde</l><r>urde<vbmod><inf><actv></r></e>
@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 bd0 <e><l>ttet</l><r>tte<vaux><pp></r></e>
 </pre>
-so you can see that the first paradigm isnt used at all and in the 2nd paradigm the %bcy% was used 42 times and the other entries 1 time each.
+So you can see that the first paradigm isn't used at all. While, in the 2nd paradigm the %bcy% was used 42 times and the other entries 1 time each.
 [[Category:Dixtools]]