Difference between revisions of "Talk:Agglutination"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Removing all content from page) |
|||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In Hungarian a word has usually 2500 forms. |
||
| − | Therefore a Hungarian dictionary with all forms would contain 1 million * 2500 words, |
||
| − | that is 2.5 GWords, approx 20 GBytes, that can not be handled by computers |
||
| − | and handling it would make no sense. |
||
| − | |||
| − | Yes, hunspell handles that perfectly, it also handles vowel harmony. |
||
| − | |||
| − | What about Apertum to handle Hungarian? [[User:Muki987|Muki987]] 10:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :I've played about with [[hunspell]] — one of its limitations iirc is that it cannot do generation, only analysis. My personal preference for handling languages like Hungarian and Finnish etc. is to use something like [[SFST]] (see also [[Omorfi]]). The problem of course is then to get someone to write the actual code. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 12:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
