Difference between revisions of "Lint"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
==Tagger==
 
==Tagger==
   
  +
==Others==
==Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}==
 
   
  +
;Lexical selection
This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:
 
  +
  +
* don't use <code>lrx-proc</code> without the <code>-m</code> option.
  +
  +
 
;Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}
  +
 
*This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:
   
 
* bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)
 
* bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)

Revision as of 07:49, 1 May 2016

Monodix

Bidix

Transfer

  • when doing <clip>, check that the attribute listed in part="" is defined using a <def-attr>.

Modes

Tagger

Others

Lexical selection
  • don't use lrx-proc without the -m option.


Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}
  • This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:
  • bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)