Difference between revisions of "Lint"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TommiPirinen (talk | contribs) (consistency litn?) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* when doing <code><clip></code>, check that the attribute listed in <code>part=""</code> is defined using a <code><def-attr></code>. |
* when doing <code><clip></code>, check that the attribute listed in <code>part=""</code> is defined using a <code><def-attr></code>. |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}== |
||
| + | |||
| + | This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems: |
||
| + | |||
| + | * bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails) |
||
Revision as of 15:43, 23 March 2016
Lexical selection
- don't use
lrx-procwithout the-moption.
Transfer
- when doing
<clip>, check that the attribute listed inpart=""is defined using a<def-attr>.
Consistency of {Multichar_Symbols/sdefs/LISTs/SETs}
This may be larger task chopped to dozens of checks, but IMO source of most problems:
- bidix should not have sdefs that are not in monodix or lexc file. (Same can be carried over to lrx, rlx, t?x etc. fails)
