Difference between revisions of "Java port of Apertium runtime"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Redirected page to Lttoolbox-java) |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | #REDIRECT [[Lttoolbox-java]] |
||
| − | A "Java port" of Apertium would enable use on |
||
| − | |||
| − | * Windows, |
||
| − | * J2ME/Android phones, |
||
| − | * web pages (applets), |
||
| − | * desktop application, |
||
| − | * Java server applications. |
||
| − | |||
| − | The last 2 is relevant as, for example an OpenOffice.org plugin should be platform independent to be maintainable. |
||
| − | |||
| − | AFAIK we havent seen anyone embedding Apertium in a desktop application. Currently Apertium is usable in a local subdir but installation isnt trivial to an end user, but note that 'embedding' something isnt the same as 'using a locally installed version'. |
||
| − | |||
| − | Having a packaged easy-to-use version of Apertium ready for embedding MT in a larger program would be very cool. |
||
| − | Ideally should a self-contained Apertium JAR file, only dependent on JRE and/or a JAR file per language pair. |
||
| − | |||
| − | An "embedding" approach is to use a client stub to an [[Apertium web service]], but there can be reasons why people prefers to have things installed locally (we don't need to repeat them here). |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Missing for a complete port of apertium in java is tagger, piping/modes, interchunk/postchunk and format handling. |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Af I see it: |
||
| − | * Interchunk/postchunk I could do in very short time, so I could mentor this |
||
| − | * Tagger: The C++ code is there and some has already been ported to Java (lttoolbox parts), probably someone could port it relatively easy, if someone understanding tagger would co-mentor that part. I'd say its not necessary to port tagger training, just the core (bigram) tagging during translation. |
||
| − | * Piping/modes isnt too hard. |
||
| − | * Format handling: I'd say that it would be OK just to be able to handle normal text. |
||
| − | |||
| − | --[[User:Jacob Nordfalk|Jacob Nordfalk]] 08:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 08:47, 5 March 2012
Redirect to:
