Comparison of part-of-speech tagging systems

From Apertium
Revision as of 16:27, 21 December 2015 by Francis Tyers (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Apertium would like to have really good part-of-speech tagging, but in many cases falls below the state-of-the-art (around 97% tagging accuracy). This page intends to collect a comparison of tagging systems in Apertium and give some ideas of what could be done to improve them.

Language System
1st CG+1st Unigram CG+Unigram apertium-tagger CG+apertium-tagger
Catalan 81.85 83.96 [75.65, 78.46] [87.76, 90.48] [94.16, 96.28] [93.92, 96.16]
Spanish 86.18 86.71 [78.20, 80.06] [87.72, 90.27]
Kazakh 80.25 86.13 [83.55, 86.19] [83.33, 86.61] n/a n/a


Todo