Difference between revisions of "Comparison of part-of-speech tagging systems"

From Apertium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
!rowspan=2|Language !!colspan=6|System
 
!rowspan=2|Language !!colspan=6|System
 
|-
 
|-
! 1st !! CG+1st !! Unigram || CG+Unigram || apertium-tagger || CG+apertium-tagger
+
! 1st !! CG+1st !! Unigram || CG+Unigram || apertium-tagger || CG+apertium-tagger
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Catalan || 81.85 || 83.96 || [75.65, 78.46]|| [87.76, 90.48] || [94.16, 96.28] || [93.92, 96.16]
 
| Catalan || 81.85 || 83.96 || [75.65, 78.46]|| [87.76, 90.48] || [94.16, 96.28] || [93.92, 96.16]
  +
|-
  +
| Kazakh || 80.25 || 86.13 || [83.55, 86.19] || [83.33, 86.61] || ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 16:02, 21 December 2015


Language System
1st CG+1st Unigram CG+Unigram apertium-tagger CG+apertium-tagger
Catalan 81.85 83.96 [75.65, 78.46] [87.76, 90.48] [94.16, 96.28] [93.92, 96.16]
Kazakh 80.25 86.13 [83.55, 86.19] [83.33, 86.61]