Difference between revisions of "CG hybrid tagging"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Tagging == The tagger is more robust against missing ambiguity sets. If it encounters a new ambiguity set it picks the a) smallest b) most frequent of them (in that order)...") |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
− | ! {{diagonal split header|Model part|Mode}} |
+ | ! {{diagonal split header|Model part|Mode}} !! 0 !! 1 !! 2 !! 3 !! 4 |
|- |
|- |
||
| Ambiguity classes || Dictionary || CG tagged || Dictionary || Dictionary || CG tagged + trimming |
| Ambiguity classes || Dictionary || CG tagged || Dictionary || Dictionary || CG tagged + trimming |
Revision as of 11:35, 15 June 2016
Tagging
The tagger is more robust against missing ambiguity sets. If it encounters a new ambiguity set it picks the a) smallest b) most frequent of them (in that order). This using of the "nearest" ambiguity set is used in other places too.
Apart from feeding in ambiguity sets as is
Tagger training
Both supervised and unsupervised:
Mode Model part |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambiguity classes | Dictionary | CG tagged | Dictionary | Dictionary | CG tagged + trimming |
Ambiguity class frequency | Untagged | CG tagged | Untagged | Untagged | CG tagged |
Corpus | Untagged | CG tagged | CG tagged (nearest) | Mix | CG tagged (nearest) |
Note that in the case of supervised training the corpus is used in conjunction with the tagged corpus.
Results
Compare with Comparison of part-of-speech tagging systems.