Talk:Speling format - Revision history

Francis Tyers at 11:03, 6 May 2011

Francis Tyers — Fri, 06 May 2011 11:03:48 GMT

Muki987 at 12:38, 13 June 2009

Muki987 — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:38:42 GMT

Muki987: New page: The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful.

Muki987 — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:38:12 GMT

New page: The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful.

New page

The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 6 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful, which is not included on the speling.org page.		The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful, which is not included on the speling.org page.

			:Yes, which is why there is [[Omorfi]]. - [[User:Francis Tyers\|Francis Tyers]] 11:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 13 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful.		The Finnish word list is according to its own description more or less useless for spell checking. It needs a rather sophisticated suffix/prefic generator to be useful, which is not included on the speling.org page.